Not only is there no scientific consensus that capitalist economic activity is causing global warming, apparently there’s no scientific data either.
A new scientific review of “global warming” studies finds that nearly 100 percent of all the measured “global warming” in studies is the result of researchers changing temperature readings to account for global warming.
“Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published [global average surface temperature (GAST)] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” the study concludes.
The study notes that while it’s not uncommon for scientists to adjust data to account for variables, in the case of so-called “climate science” nearly 100 percent of the adjustments were made in order to produce higher temperatures than what was measured.
“Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, tells The Daily Caller News Foundation. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”
“You would think that when you make adjustments you’d sometimes get warming and sometimes get cooling. That’s almost never happened,” said D’Aleo, who co-authored the study with statistician James Wallace and Cato Institute climate scientist Craig Idso, the Daily Caller reports.
Between this, Michael Mann’s “hockey stick” hoax and Climategate, is there any bigger lie than “man-made global warming?”